18 Gennaio 2011 alle 21:49
#54912
::
Insisto sul discorso del rientro a capoverso. Guarda quanto appare brutto questo pezzo di codice se lascio lavorare il latex xome dici tu:
`
\section{Temperature dependence of $\lambda$}
At low temperatures $\lambda\approx$costant. Near $T_c$ penetration depth $\lambda$ go to infinite.
\begin{equation}\label{eq_2.3}
\lambda(T)=\frac{\lambda_0}{(1-t^4)^{1/2}}.
\end{equation}
Where $\lambda_0=$ penetration depth at $T=0K$
\indent\quad\quad\;\;\;\;\; $t=\frac{T}{T_c}=$ relative temperature.
When $T\into T_c$, then magnetic flux penetrate throughout the sample.
Temperature dependence is very sharp: to obtain $\lambda=1nm$, sample should be only $10^{-7}\%$ below $T_c$.
`
E’ orribile e non lo puoi negare!