Insisto sul discorso del rientro a capoverso. Guarda quanto appare brutto questo pezzo di codice se lascio lavorare il latex xome dici tu:
`
\section{Temperature dependence of $\lambda$}
At low temperatures $\lambda\approx$costant. Near $T_c$ penetration depth $\lambda$ go to infinite.
\begin{equation}\label{eq_2.3}
\lambda(T)=\frac{\lambda_0}{(1-t^4)^{1/2}}.
\end{equation}Where $\lambda_0=$ penetration depth at $T=0K$
\indent\quad\quad\;\;\;\;\; $t=\frac{T}{T_c}=$ relative temperature.
When $T\into T_c$, then magnetic flux penetrate throughout the sample.
Temperature dependence is very sharp: to obtain $\lambda=1nm$, sample should be only $10^{-7}\%$ below $T_c$.
`
E’ orribile e non lo puoi negare!
Quello non è LaTeX, se permetti. 🙂
`\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,siunitx}
\begin{document}
\section{Temperature dependence of $\lambda$}
At low temperatures $\lambda\approx\textit{constant}$.
Near $T_c$ the penetration depth $\lambda$ goes to
infinity because
\begin{equation}\label{eq_2.3}
\lambda(T)=\frac{\lambda_0}{(1-t^4)^{1/2}},
\end{equation}
where
\begin{align*}
&\lambda_0=\text{penetration depth at $T=\SI{0}{K}$,}\\
&t=\frac{T}{T_c}=\text{relative temperature.}
\end{align*}
When $T\into T_c$, then the magnetic flux penetrates through the sample.
Temperature dependence is very sharp: to obtain $\lambda=\SI{1}{nm}$,
the sample should be only $10^{-7}$\,\% below $T_c$.
\end{document}`
Darei un’attenta occhiata alla grammatica, oltre che al LaTeX.
Ciao
Enrico