fancyhdr o nccfancyhdr?

Nei ritagli di tempo lavoro alla sistemazione grafica della mia tesi e sono arrivato al problema dell’intestazione e del piè di pagina di un documento.

ok, la risposta è automatica, usa il pacchetto fancyhdr.

era quello che stavo per fare, andandomi a leggere la documentazione, usando TCOBrowser, quando l’occhio mi è caduto su nccfancyhdr

l’autore scrive:

This package is originated on the fancyhdr package by Piet van Oostrum.
It provides almost the same functionality but implements it in more safe and
simple way. The most important reason for re-implementation the fancyhdr was
that fancy page style breaks conventions on page styles definition: avoiding global
definitions in page styling commands. If this contract is broken, a page style cannot
be used locally as a parameter of the \thispagestyle command. Other reasons
for such re-implementation were the following: some commands in fancyhdr do
more than it is necessary (e.g. the fancy page style redefines section marks),
incorrect vertical alignment in headers leads to raising headers a bit (this produces
a page overfull if header height is exactly the same as a height of text in it),
some features introduced in the fancyhdr are unsafe (a special cycle \@forc is
introduced with the \def command), and the implementation of commands is
frequently too complicated. All these disadvantages of fancyhdr set off me to
prepare a new version of fancyhdr packaged named as the nccfancyhdr.

voi che dite? qualcuno lo conosce? lo usa?